<div dir="ltr"><div>Yes please, I think that is the best way out for qemu.</div><div><br></div><div>Alex<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 11:35, Marco Felsch <<a href="mailto:m.felsch@pengutronix.de">m.felsch@pengutronix.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On 19-06-14 15:37, Alexander Kanavin wrote:<br>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 15:36, Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> > > Dropping the swrast dependency will not help though, as it is provided<br>
> > by the mesa-megadriver package, which will continue to include swrast as<br>
> > long as it is enabled in the mesa recipe. mesa-megadriver is also pulled in<br>
> > through other dependencies.<br>
> ><br>
> > Won't that stop the build failure on the autobuilder though?<br>
> ><br>
> <br>
> Yes, I think it would.<br>
<br>
So should I change that dependency to virgl since it is a qemu target?<br>
Sorry but I can not see an agreement how we can change this in a 'good'<br>
way for all parties.<br>
<br>
My point of view is that it should not be enabled per default. Of course<br>
I should fix the qemu config but I don't wanna fix each meta-layer.<br>
Becuase I think that is the work of meta-layer maintainer.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Marco<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Pengutronix e.K. | |<br>
Industrial Linux Solutions | <a href="http://www.pengutronix.de/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.pengutronix.de/</a> |<br>
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |<br>
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |<br>
</blockquote></div>