<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 14:55, <<a href="mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org">richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">You followed up mentioning this wasn't with master-next. I think there<br>
is a patch in -next which will help with the empty task spin so both<br>
together might get us back to more normal numbers.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>As all of these patches are now in master, I re-ran the test with that (209f89ab8ed51ac2867ca8f749336af1ee24ab25), but without including the spinning task part, pressing ctrl-c just as it starts. The outcome is 9m42s, compared to 2m9s for the baseline (<span class="gmail-im">6c7c0cefd34067311144a1d4c01986fe0a4aef26). So the worst is fixed, but the slowdown is still noticeable.<br></span></div><div></div><div><br></div><div>Alex<br> </div></div></div>