<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 22:01, Alexander Kanavin <<a href="mailto:alex.kanavin@gmail.com">alex.kanavin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 21:56, Ross Burton <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">> I don't think this was intentional?<br>
<br>
A more idiomatic way of handling this, although it would break <br>
dependencies, would be to inherit bin_package.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah, the packaging was hidden under all the build hacks so I didn't spot it. Let's do the inherit, library dependencies should be automatically updated via shlibs.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>*lib*_package :)<br></div><div><br></div><div>Actually, that'd be many recipes to fix (attr -> attr-bin), so it's best to put the two lines back. <br></div></div></div>