<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 16:55, Tom Rini <<a href="mailto:trini@konsulko.com">trini@konsulko.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I have to admit I'm guessing at what level of automated run-time testing<br>
we normally have today. We sanity test a sysvinit+busybox image with<br>
networking, yes? If so, we also do that on systemd and I assume with<br>
what I put for the systemd+busybox-free we also do there, yes?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I believe we test sysvinit+busybox, and systemd+busybox at runtime via poky and poky-alt distro configs.</div><div><br></div><div>We also test systemd+busybox-free core-base-utils (without ifupdown), but only as a build (no runtime tests). See lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/imagefeatures.py.</div><div><br></div><div>Alex<br></div></div></div>