<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 22:23, Richard Purdie <<a href="mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org">richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 14:27 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:<br>
> Remove inet-6-.defn-fix-inverted-checks-for-loopback.patch as<br>
> it is difficult to rebase and not clear if still necessary.<br>
> <br>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <<a href="mailto:alex.kanavin@gmail.com" target="_blank">alex.kanavin@gmail.com</a>><br>
> ---<br>
> ...efn-fix-inverted-checks-for-loopback.patch | 403 ----------------<br>
> --<br>
> ...{<a href="http://ifupdown_0.8.22.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">ifupdown_0.8.22.bb</a> => <a href="http://ifupdown_0.8.35.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">ifupdown_0.8.35.bb</a>} | 11 +-<br>
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 409 deletions(-)<br>
> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/ifupdown/files/inet-6-.defn-<br>
> fix-inverted-checks-for-loopback.patch<br>
> rename meta/recipes-core/ifupdown/{<a href="http://ifupdown_0.8.22.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">ifupdown_0.8.22.bb</a> =><br>
> <a href="http://ifupdown_0.8.35.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">ifupdown_0.8.35.bb</a>} (83%)<br>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/305656/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/305656/</a><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I had a closer look at how and where ifupdown recipe is used, and from what I see it isn't:</div>every configuration is relying on busybox to provide the same utilities. That's why the failure is seen only in world builds :)<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Should we drop the ifupdown recipe?</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Alex<br></div></div>