<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 22:31, Richard Purdie <<a href="mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org">richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">> I found an old ticket where piglit was proposed for the core image<br>
> testing, and the idea was rejected due to its huge install size, so I<br>
> won't be pursuing this further.<br>
> <a href="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10047" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10047</a><br>
> <br>
> Would you still say it's worth to keep the recipe in core? Python-<br>
> numpy (that piglit and only piglit needs) isn't trivial to maintain<br>
> either (for instance, update to latest version needs cython to be<br>
> added to core).<br>
<br>
That bug is for piglit as a default in testapps. We decided that was a<br>
bad idea, not that testing with piglit was a bad idea overall.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>So adding piglit to perhaps core-image-sato-ptest would be okay? (with the resulting increase in size and do_rootfs times) <br></div><div><br></div><div>Alex<br></div></div></div>