[oe] STAGING_BINDIR
Richard Purdie
rpurdie at rpsys.net
Mon Nov 27 01:03:21 UTC 2006
I now have two rough patches:
http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/temp/stage-bindir1.patch
which just renames variables. Should be safe to apply with a change to
add the new names to bitbake.conf. I will probably apply this soon
(Monday evening?) unless anyone objects. I don't fancy having this lying
around for long.
http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/temp/stage-bindir2.patch
These are the more invasive changes or need special handling.
Of all the references to STAGING_BINDIR I filtered, these were the two
I didn't like the look of or understand:
These look totally wrong:
./packages/qte/qtopia-core_4.2.0.bb: install -m 0755 ${STAGE_TEMP}/${bindir}/rcc ${STAGING_BINDIR}
./packages/qte/qtopia-core_4.2.0.bb: install -m 0755 ${STAGE_TEMP}/${bindir}/moc ${STAGING_BINDIR}
./packages/qte/qtopia-core_4.2.0.bb: install -m 0755 ${STAGE_TEMP}/${bindir}/uic ${STAGING_BINDIR}
./packages/qte/qtopia-core_4.2.0.bb: install -m 0755 ${STAGE_TEMP}/${bindir}/qmake ${STAGING_BINDIR}
And I have no idea what this is doing but it looks wrong:
./packages/uqm/uqm_0.3.bb: ./build-opts.sh ${STAGING_DIR} ${STAGING_BINDIR} ${STAGING_LIBDIR}
./packages/uqm/uqm_0.5.0.bb: ./build-opts.sh ${STAGING_DIR} ${STAGING_BINDIR} ${STAGING_LIBDIR}
If anyone fancies trying a build from scratch with both patches applied
for their favourite packages/images, particularly e-image, feedback
would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Richard
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list