[oe] Did someone break X ?

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
> Hello Koen,
> 
> Friday, September 29, 2006, 10:06:11 PM, you wrote:
> 
> 
>> OE Build Configuration:
>> BB_VERSION     = "1.7.0"
>> OE_REVISION    = "<unknown>"
>> TARGET_ARCH    = "i686"
>> TARGET_OS      = "linux"
>> MACHINE        = "guinness"
>> DISTRO         = "angstrom"
>> DISTRO_VERSION = "test-20060929"
>> TARGET_FPU     = ""
> 
>> NOTE: Resolving missing task queue dependencies
>> NOTE: Removing failed runtime build target xserver-kdrive-fbdev
>> ERROR: No providers of runtime build target xserver-kdrive after filtering (for
>> ['/home/koen/OE/monotone/org.openembedded.dev/packages/xorg-xserver/xserver-kdrive_X11R7.1-1.1.0.bb'])
>> NOTE: Removing failed runtime build target xserver-kdrive
>> NOTE: Removing failed runtime build target virtual/xserver
>> NOTE: Removing failed runtime build target angstrom-x11-base-depends
>> NOTE: Removing failed runtime build target angstrom-gpe-task-pim
>> NOTE: Removing failed runtime build target angstrom-gpe-task-settings
>> NOTE: Removing failed runtime build target angstrom-gpe-task-base
>> NOTE: multiple providers are available (xserver-xorg, xserver-kdrive-omap);
>> NOTE: consider defining PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/xserver
>> NOTE: Removing failed runtime build target ipaq-sleep
>> NOTE: Removing failed runtime build target suspend-desktop
>> NOTE: Removing failed runtime build target gpe-conf
>> NOTE: Preparing Runqueue
>> NOTE: Executing runqueue
>> NOTE: build 200609292052: completed
>> Build statistics:
>>   Attempted builds: 0
> 
>     Well, it's not easy to grasp anything form these messages. While I
> hacked xserver-kdrive_X11R7.1-1.1.0.bb (rather, it's patches)
> yesterday, that was to make it build (do_configure) for angstrom arm.
> 
>    What about suspecting --enable-w100 switch Michael Lauer had to
> disable in xserver-kdrive_git.bb to make it build for x86?

Mickeyl had a problem *during* build, OE isn't letting me *start* a build right now, while
it did do that yesterday. I looks like something changed with (R)DEPENDS.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFHX+PMkyGM64RGpERAhCKAKC4IVkByqNkxeMp5c1Oh2KkjdsYSgCgkNLs
QF8wJjTNgtfnm6ahi1edPq8=
=6iw2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----