[oe] A question of workflow

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 13:53 -0800, Justin Patrin wrote:
> On 1/8/07, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> wrote:
> > Patrick Ohly schreef:
> > So after every first commmit the tree is in a broken state, where-as if a developers
> > applied a fixed patch in one go it wouldn't be. Sounds like your concept is badly broken.
> 
> Apply, commit (note brokenness if needed in commit message), then fix
> it, commit, and push. Don't push before fixing.

The argument against this in other projects like the kernel is that you
just broke the git-bisect method of debugging...

I'm not a fan of broken patches being committed...

Richard