[oe] RFC: Xorg Version Numbering

[Richard Purdie]

On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 12:34 +0100, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> On 1/31/07, Graeme Gregory <dp at xora.org.uk> wrote:
> > My memory of why X11R7.X ended up in the PV is that at the time bitbake
> > didnt support an epoch in the PV. This was a hack to make sure that xorg
> > 6.X stuff upgraded to 7.X properly.
> >
> > I guess this opens the discussion on bitbake and epochs again.
> >
> > Graeme
> 
> Right, that was the reason.
> I'd absolutely prefer to switch to the individual release versions and
> set an epoch if somebody could add epoch support to bitbake.

Can anyone remember the specifics of the problem with bitbake? I guess
its easy enough to test and find out...

/me adds looking at this to his todo list...
(unless anyone beats me to it ;-)

Cheers,

Richard