[oe] QA for intentionally unpackaged files

[Michael Krelin]

> 
>> UNSHIPPED = "${libdir}/libpython2.4.so ${bindir}/smtpd.py"  #reason why
>> not package/ship it
> 
>         Who exactly will go over all recipes and add such lines?

I take it the proposal was that package maintainers should take care of
it. Indeed, it would be better if intentionally unpackaged files invoked
no QA notice. But I think the solution is either not install them or rm
them after installation, depending on installation procedure nature.


Love,
H