[oe] minimal-image.bb

Stelios Koroneos skoroneos at digital-opsis.com
Tue May 15 08:10:29 UTC 2007


> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-devel-bounces at openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces at openembedded.org]On Behalf Of
> Rolf Leggewie
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 5:35 PM
> To: openembedded-devel at openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [oe] minimal-image.bb
>
>
> Stelios Koroneos wrote:
> > In my opinion if angstrom-minimal-image is not distro specific should be
> > renamed to minimal-image
>
> I agree with Stelios that the belief that angstrom-minimal-image is a
> distro-specific image is a reasonable assumption.  If that is not the
> case, I am in favor renaming.


There is a bigger issue here than the name of package and that the reason i
brought this matter up.
Angstrom without any dough is the biggest distro supported by OE, but its
not the only one.
No one should also dough that Koen has done a lot of work (and is still
doing) and credits should go to him for a lot of the things in OE, including
the angstrom-minimal-image.bb, but i believe the real issue goes beyond the
developer/distro thing.

Actions like that, give the wrong signals to the people who are looking at
OE for incorporation/support of their products(and believe me there are
*alot* that do that as we speak)
If a distro maintainer (or any OE developer in that fact) comes with a way
of handling things better for his distro that could be used as a generic
framework for others it should be done so and not discouraged.

I am firm believer in community work and that things that could benefit the
OE community should be handled as such and not as distro-specific.







More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list