[oe] bug #747, qmake & possible missing bbclass

Michael 'Mickey' Lauer mickey at openmoko.org
Fri Oct 12 10:38:18 UTC 2007


thomas.cooksey at bt.com wrote:

> Pretty sure this list isn't the right place for this but...

I've forwarded it to openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org

> There's a bug on bugzilla (#747) which I've also encountered and fixed.

> First, I think this may be a bug in upstream qmake 4.3.1 as I've
> been developing a lot with Qtopia outside OpenMoko. Every time I run
> qmake -project I have to manually add network to the QT variable in
> the project file, even for hello world.

> Second, I also needed to modify the Makefile qmake produced and
> edit the "LINK= $(OE_QMAKE_LINK)" to LINK=$(CXX). This is because
> OE_QMAKE_LINK isn't defined. Looking through the OpenEmbedded tree
> there is a class called qmake.bbclass (& qmake2.bbclass) which
> defines OE_QMAKE_LINK. I don't know OpenEmbedded too well but I do
> know portage/gentoo and I assume a bbclass is like an eclass in
> portage?? If that's the case, surely the uicmoc4-native_4.3.1 recipe
> needs to inherit from the qmake or qmake2 class? I guess this may
> have been fixed in upstream OpenEmbedded? Like I say, my
> OpenEmbedded knowledge is a bit limited, so what I just wrote may make no sense whatsoever.

> PS: In future, where's the best place for this kind of stuff? Should I have created a new bug?

Please not for OpenMoko, but at bugs.openembedded.org


> _______________________________________________
> OpenMoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



-- 
- Michael Lauer <mickey at openmoko.org>                   http://openmoko.org/
============================================================================
Software for the worlds' first truly open Free Software mobile phone





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list