[oe] [Angstrom-devel] Best place to send new/updated bb files?

[Paul Sokolovsky]

Hello,

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:40:48 +0100
Rolf Leggewie <no2spam at nospam.arcornews.de> wrote:

> Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> >> Simple search shows 50 potential open bugs with new recipes:
> >> http://bugs.openembedded.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=attachments.filename&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=.bb
> 
> > We even have http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2194 ,
> > maintained by Rolf.
> 
> Thanks for bringing that up.  I'd like to see more core devs pay

Like that, except not "core devs", but just "devs". If OE must depend
on core devs for each sneeze, then it's feet-tied. Core devs should
work on general problems and rules for OE, not on mundane recipes.

> attention to 2194 which is essentially the bug "I reviewed it, it
> contains a patch or request for change in unmistakable terms, but it
> touches something I don't understand and might have too far-reaching
> implication for me to dare and commit it" - triaged.  IOW, it needs
> more experienced people to actually commit or reject the bug.
> 
> The bug with the new or updated bb files is 2228, not 2194.

[]

-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                          mailto:pmiscml at gmail.com