[oe] RFC: add osso version of libtool and libatk

[Robert Schuster]

Hi,
I can live with the plain versions, too. For libtool I re-added 1.5.6 as
discussed on IRC. I will prepare a similar patch for atk.

Holger Freyther schrieb:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008 13:29:15 Robert Schuster wrote:
>> Hi,
>> on IRC it was suggested to put this on the mailing list.
> 
> Hey,
> I don't like adding vendor hacked versions of standard software at all. I see 
> the requirement you are facing but adding a Nokia hacked version is not the 
> right way to do it.
> 
> What are the differences you see? Can you extract the patch that is doing 
> that? Is that patch a good idea and can be applied to our version of libtool?
> 
> 
> kind regards
> 	z.
> 
> 
> PS: I care more for libtool than atk+ (did they break API/ABI compability on 
> it?) 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20080108/7fbad187/attachment-0002.sig>