[oe] bitbake vs incremental builds
Rich Pixley
rich.pixley at palm.com
Fri Jun 20 01:03:08 UTC 2008
Richard Purdie wrote:
> It wasn't done for a long time simply because nobody had taken the time
> to implement it. It has however recently been implemented, simply set:
>
> BB_STAMP_POLICY = "full"
> or
> BB_STAMP_POLICY = "whitelist"
>
> Whitelist allows you to exempt certain packages from stamp checking, see
> packaged-staging.bbclass for an example.
This isn't working for me simply by taking a top of tree bitbake and
shoving it into my environment. However, my OE environment is over a
year old and is moderately hacked locally.
I tried to write a trivial test case, but I got bogged down. It's not
at all clear to me what one would need to do to use bitbake in some
environment other than OE. I was hoping it would be simple to just
write an empty conf/bitbake.conf and a couple of a.bb and b.bb files
with a depending on b, but 2hrs later I'm still confused.
So this isn't working for me and I don't see an easy way to debug it.
Any suggestions?
--rich
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list