[oe] Reconsidering the work flow and how the SCM system fits in

[Paul Sokolovsky]

Hello,

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:03:13 -0500
Mike Westerhof <mwester at dls.net> wrote:

>  On Wed 12/03/08  4:40 PM , Paul Sokolovsky pmiscml at gmail.com sent:
> ...
> > With mtn we seem to have very cheap and robust mirroring and
> > high-availability. Well, any DSCM lean on possibility of easy
> > mirroring, but Monotone with its super-cool concept of unbelievably
> > cheap branches (so-called heads), ...
> 
> Hehe! Yes, and I could describe an automobile spinning out-of-control
> on a patch of ice as "unbelievably cheap steering" just as well.
> Let's not overlook the fact that the multiple-heads issue with
> monotone is very seldom because the person doing it *wished* for that
> to happen.

Vice-versa, as was noted already, we have separate head created
almost on each commit (i.e. mtn merge almost always has something to
do on each run after commit). So, can one imagine more lightweight
branches - they are being created even without any explicit command!
Poor git is left far behind with its heavy branch commands! ;-D

> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Best regards,
> > Paul                          pmiscml at gma
> > il.com
> 
> Mike (mwester)

[]

-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                          mailto:pmiscml at gmail.com