[oe] Eureka! AVR32 ld-uClibc.so segfault solved

[Khem Raj]

Geoffrey,

Try to build uclibc with V=1 on commandline and check what extra flags
are passed due to this option. I think these flags might be incorrect
for AVR32

Thanks

-Khem


On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Robert Wörle
<robert at linuxdevelopment.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>  > So I now have a working OE based AVR32 build system, using binutils
>  > 2.17.atmel.0.0.99 20060623, gcc 4.2.1-atmel.1.0.3, and uClibc 0.9.29-atmel.1.
>  > This is essentially the same as Atmel's buildroot-avr32-v2.1.0.  As soon as I
>  > clean stuff up a little, I'll submit patches for this via bugzilla.  Minus
>  > this uclibc.inc diff.  I need more expert opinion on this.
>  >
>  > Thanks to all those who helped!
>  > ---
>
>
>  excellent job, can you supply any patches you have already, i would be
>  more then happy to bring this up ( again !)
>
>  rob_w
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Openembedded-devel mailing list
>  Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>  http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>