[oe] KERNEL_INCLUDES in uClibc.
Mikael Rosbacke
mikael at rosbacke.org
Tue Nov 18 14:56:44 UTC 2008
Tnx, good to have a recommended way to do it.
Tried it but failed on the same spot. Checked bugzilla and found bug
#4289 which seems to be the same behaviour as I see, but on another
target. I've added my findings to that bug-report.
I'll think I'll wait a bit with the uclibc version until that bug can be
fixed or otherwise worked around.
Thank you for your time,
--- Mikael R
mån 2008-11-17 klockan 14:23 +0100 skrev Koen Kooi:
> On 17-11-08 13:43, Mikael Rosbacke wrote:
> > mån 2008-11-17 klockan 13:25 +0100 skrev Koen Kooi:
> >> On 17-11-08 12:58, Mikael Rosbacke wrote:
> >>> Good day.
> >>>
> >>> I'm currently trying to get a uClibc based minimal image for x86 to
> >>> build and have some problems with it. I'm using DISTRO='minimal-uclibc'
> >>> and MACHINE='x86' and trying to build the target 'minimal-image'.
> >> Try using the angstrom distribution, since minima-uclibc isn't really
> >> support or working currently.
> >>
> > I've managed to get Angstrom working with glibc some days ago. But I
> > would like to have something smaller.
>
> Images tell what goes into a rootfs, not a distro, so 'smaller' isn't a
> criterium for switching distro.
>
> > I scanned the distro folder but
> > couldn't find a uClibc variant of it. Is there some other way to make
> > angstrom use the uclibc?
>
> ANGSTROM_MODE = "uclibc" in local.conf or 'ANGSTROM_MODE=uclibc bitbake
> <foo>"
>
> regards,
>
> Koen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list