[oe] RFC: Making it mandantory to have a checksums.ini entry

[Otavio Salvador]

Holger Freyther <zecke at selfish.org> writes:

> The spend time on copy and pasting a checksums.ini entry is really small and 
> the value is very high. Stuff like macports is forcing one to have checksums 
> as well.

This makes a lot of sense for me since the way it is being used
currently makes no sense.

If people has internal repositories that don't want to use checksum it
can be allowed by recipe basis as you already support in your proposed
patch.

+1

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio at debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."