[oe] remove ld.so.conf from glibc?

[Phil Blundell]

On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 12:48 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> I would say we fix it. Logically this file could belong to libc as it
> is. but we edit it and make it load
> sub conf files which are owned by different packages and it there is
> none then it loads nothing. This is how it is on ubuntu and fedora.
> 
> $ cat /etc/ld.so.conf
> include ld.so.conf.d/*.conf
> 
> any package can have there own .conf file which can be installed in
> 
> /etc/ld.so.conf.d/
> 
> /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ are packaged as part of libc

That sounds like it would be overkill for most embedded DISTROs.  Making
a separate package to ship those bits seems like it would be a fine
idea, but I am not convinced we want them as standard fitment in libc6
itself.  Do you know of any existing package/DISTRO combinations in oe
that would actually benefit from this feature?

p.