[oe] [STABLE][PATCH] mingw-binutils: update to 2.19.1

Tom Rini trini at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Apr 6 23:54:02 UTC 2009


On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:14:07AM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <eha at doredevelopment.dk>
> ---
>  .../mingw-binutils-canadian-cross_2.19.1.bb        |   11 +++++++++++
>  recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils_2.19.1.bb          |   12 ++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils-canadian-cross_2.19.1.bb
>  create mode 100644 recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils_2.19.1.bb

First, this isn't in .dev yet.  Second..

> diff --git a/recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils-canadian-cross_2.19.1.bb
> b/recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils-canadian-cross_2.19.1.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..27e06c6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils-canadian-cross_2.19.1.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +require mingw-binutils_${PV}.bb
> +require binutils-canadian-cross.inc
> +
> +DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_sdk-mingw32 = "1"
> +DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_sdk-mingw64 = "1"

That's meaningless atm.  Or at least it is for how I've been doing all
of the build tests (SDK_OS=mingw32), it would be just _mingw32 (does
mingw64 work yet?).  Finally, do we really want to make this default
when we're still building gcc-3.4.5?  I wouldn't think so, but I assume
this means a gcc 4 actual release is soon.

Oh, and you forgot to add in checksums :)

-- 
Tom Rini




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list