[oe] [STABLE][PATCH] mingw-binutils: update to 2.19.1
Tom Rini
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Apr 6 23:54:02 UTC 2009
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:14:07AM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <eha at doredevelopment.dk>
> ---
> .../mingw-binutils-canadian-cross_2.19.1.bb | 11 +++++++++++
> recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils_2.19.1.bb | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils-canadian-cross_2.19.1.bb
> create mode 100644 recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils_2.19.1.bb
First, this isn't in .dev yet. Second..
> diff --git a/recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils-canadian-cross_2.19.1.bb
> b/recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils-canadian-cross_2.19.1.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..27e06c6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes/binutils/mingw-binutils-canadian-cross_2.19.1.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +require mingw-binutils_${PV}.bb
> +require binutils-canadian-cross.inc
> +
> +DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_sdk-mingw32 = "1"
> +DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_sdk-mingw64 = "1"
That's meaningless atm. Or at least it is for how I've been doing all
of the build tests (SDK_OS=mingw32), it would be just _mingw32 (does
mingw64 work yet?). Finally, do we really want to make this default
when we're still building gcc-3.4.5? I wouldn't think so, but I assume
this means a gcc 4 actual release is soon.
Oh, and you forgot to add in checksums :)
--
Tom Rini
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list