[oe] [PATCH 03/11] linux-libc-headers 2.6.23: fix amd64 headers

Roman I Khimov khimov at altell.ru
Wed Apr 15 19:25:46 UTC 2009


On Wednesday 15 April 2009 23:09:13 Khem Raj wrote:
> On (15/04/09 16:35), Roman I Khimov wrote:
> > --- a/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb
> > +++ b/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb
> > @@ -63,4 +63,16 @@ do_stage () {
>
> is there any reason not to use sanitized header like we do in do_install
> even for do_stage

I think this is the way to go for newer kernels and it can be generalized in 
some .inc for future. This approach is used now in 
linux-libc-headers_2.6.29.bb, but 2.6.23 historically uses this kind of 
do_stage and I don't think we should change that now.

BTW, we have locally a patch modifying kernel.bbclass to also use 
headers_install in kernel_do_stage for newer kernels. One of many things I 
still need to prepare and push.




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list