[oe] [PATCH] glibc 2.7 and 2.9 (arm): Remove unnecessary asm/page.h include

[Jonathan Cameron]

Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Phil
> 
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Phil Blundell<pb at reciva.com> wrote:
>> Oh, and, as for bumping PR: in this case I would suggest not doing it.
>> The output binaries should be identical with and without that header,
>> and for folks doing online upgrades it is a bit of a pain to have glibc
>> rebuild unnecessarily.
> 
> I disagree and think it ought to be bumped so it gets deployed and
> tested as soon as possible.
> 
> People that cares about online updates are supposed to be using stable
> to reduce it.
> 
Happy to go with either option, but keen to get this merged soon.

Can we come to a consensus on whether to bump the PR?

If we do want to, can someone push this to the repository.

Thanks,

Jonathan