[oe] [oe-commits] Stanislav Brabec : glibc: Install ld.so.conf , so ldconfig does not complain .

[Holger Hans Peter Freyther]

On Thursday 27 August 2009 13:32:31 Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > I have the feeling this is the reversal of a previous decision to
> > > remove ld.so.conf from rootfs.
> > >
> > > Also its a core change and I don't see any Acked-By:
> >
> > Agreed, that change seems wrong.  If a particular DISTRO wants to ship
> > ld.so.conf in glibc then that's fine,
>
> I just reverted this change. Sorry for that. It looked just like a typo:
> ld.so.conf was copied to source tree and the patch suppressing the
> warning on missing ld.so.conf (ldconfig.patch) was commented out...
>
> If missing ld.so.conf is intended, ld.co.sonf could be removed from
> recipes and ldconfig.patch (or at least its last chunk) should be
> applied.
>
> > but it shouldn't be standard and
> > definitely not without a USE_LDCONFIG conditional.
>
> It was inside USE_LDCONFIG, if ldconfig is installed.
>
> By the way, what is the benefit of not using ldconfig? Strace shows 15
> extra failing library lookups for each library.

did we disable the hwcaps patch once again?

z.