[oe] checksums situation
Tom Rini
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Fri Feb 13 17:09:59 UTC 2009
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 05:28:08PM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> It is nearly two years since conf/checksums.ini was introduced. We
> populated it with over 6000 entries during that time (mostly by
> automatic fetching of all source on CELF and EWI machines). But there
> are problems with it's format.
>
> First problem is how to use it when overlays are used. Not every entry
> of SRC_URI can be provided into public (NDA binaries etc) so people
> starts to switch off checking of checksums which is not good idea. OE
> reads only one copy of file. OK, such users can copy it to their overlay
> and extend with own entries which will work with properly created value
> of BBPATH variable. But this does not sound as solution.
People with overlays already need to setup BBPATH correctly, so I don't
think this part is an issue.
[snip]
> Other was to use filename as key and add "url[0-xx]" fields which will
> list alternative locations. This one looks better but still does not
> solve situation when someone use DEBIAN_MIRROR which is not present in
> checksums.ini file.
Could we perhaps have a literal:
['${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/...']
md5sum:...
sha256:...
format instead?
--
Tom Rini
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list