[oe] checksums situation

Ihar Hrachyshka ihar.hrachyshka at gmail.com
Fri Feb 13 17:39:39 UTC 2009


On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio at debian.org> wrote:
> Marcin Juszkiewicz <openembedded at haerwu.biz> writes:
>
> <...>
>> This solution also has one nasty part - now we can keep SRC_URI for
>> multiple versions in common file, but if we switch to storing it in
>> SRC_URI we will have to change that.
>>
>> Other solution proposed on IRC was to keep checksums in extra file in
>> each directory of packages/ subdirectory. I think that it is not best
>> but sounds better then one file.
>>
>> What do you think? Which way we should go? Do you have other ideas?
> <...>
>
> What about having a checksums for _each_ recipe?
>
> foo_1.0.bb
> foo_1.0.md5sum

This will waste directories and will make tree navigation harder.

>
> This could have the valid one; this also avoid the sorting problem and
> like.
>
> --
>        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
> ---------------------------------------------
>  E-mail: otavio at debian.org      UIN: 5906116
>  GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
>  Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
> ---------------------------------------------
> "Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
>  you the whole house."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list