[oe] Autobuilder bugs versus stable branch being updated
Junqian Gordon Xu
xjqian at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 23:21:28 UTC 2009
On 02/17/2009 03:55 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:54:46PM +0100, Bernhard Guillon wrote:
>> Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>>> Philip,
>>>
>>> thank you for your comment.
>>>
>>> Philip Balister wrote:
>>>> I think it is a but of stretch to close old autobuilder bugs with the
>>>> comment the stable branch will not be updated.
>>> That should not be the case (unless of course they were both of type
>>> .stable and -autobuild).
>>>
>> We should create a new stable branch. The old one drifted too much away
>> from .dev which makes it hard to backport things from .dev to stable.
>
> The problem really is a policy one. The old stable was "angstrom
> snapped for 2007 here". That's one way to do a stable branch, but not
> what everyone thinks when they read "stable". How much would it hurt to
> have OE actually do releases, rather than to be, in kernel terms, mostly
> like Andrew's tree (once stuff seems to work for some people, pull it
> in, see what breaks)?
+1 for releases instead of snap short, which was proven not working for
the users.
>
> And of course, who would volunteer to actually try and maintain such
> things and get everyone using the various branches that would have to
> entail, correctly?
>
I can maintain the user space stuffs and communicate/bug core members
for stuff that I do not understand. In terms of machines, I will keep an
eye on tosa and spitz. I've been away for a while since the git
conversion (now half-way through the git manual), but I always try to
keep up with the mailing lists.
Regards
Gordon
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list