[oe] checksums situation
Tom Rini
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Feb 24 15:02:47 UTC 2009
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:49:04AM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 of February 2009 07:46:39 Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > And, is anyone doing more then 'cat tmp/checksums.ini >>
> > openembedded/conf/checksums.ini && python the-sorter' ? And by more
> > I mean check for an upstream .md5 or similar, to make sure this is
> > really right?
>
> commit 67aa127f4b4cb2e4083a02adfddd7d82534751a3
> Author: Marcin Juszkiewicz <hrw at openembedded.org>
> Date: Thu Nov 13 18:07:47 2008 +0100
>
> checksums.ini: add 1212 entries from test fetch build
>
> This is result of simple shell script and few hours of fetching:
> for recipe in $OEROOT/packages/*/*.bb
> do
> bitbake -b $recipe -cfetch
> done
>
> This was done with not so empty DL_DIR but most of entries were fresh
> fetched. If someone has machine with good network connection (I no
> longer have access to machine where I was running that test) then feel
> free to call that loop with empty DL_DIR.
IOW, no. We're just using checksums.ini as a "at one point, it was ..."
and not actually making sure that it's the right checksum.
--
Tom Rini
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list