[oe] RFC: "Virtual" native and sdk recipes

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:10:26AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 09:47:28PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 12:54:50AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > a) We push my tree into OE
> > 
> > Done on your behalf now.
> > 
> > > b) You rebase onto my tree's changes and adjust the EXEEXT stuff.
> > > 
> > > c) You add changes which add the EXEEXT changes only to existing 
> > >    recipes and commit that.
> > > 
> > > d) The checksums.ini changes are a no brainer.
> > > 
> > > e) You start adding the totally new files to OE directly in a logical 
> > >    sequence of something like:
> > > 
> > >    i) Add canadian core classes (classes/canadian*)
> > >    ii) Add mingw new recipes
> > >    iii) Add misc support recipes (gmp/mprf-canadian)
> > >    iv) Add new binutils recipes
> > >    v) Add new gcc recipes
> > 
> > OK, this is the trini/canadian-merge branch.
> 
> I would like to merge those new recipes (not the changes to existing
> stuff) on the 26th, if no one objects.

A few days later even, and done.  I'm going to start a new thread for my
next round of comment-getting.

-- 
Tom Rini