[oe] getting bitbake-1.8.12 for the org.openembedded.dev branch?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Sat Jul 25 21:43:09 UTC 2009
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:01:20 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > for consistency, either bitbake should be included in an OE
> > checkout, or it shouldn't. it shouldn't depend on which branch
> > you're working with. that way lies confusion.
>
> In which way do you see breakage? bin/bitbake is gone when you
> switch from stable to dev? So you executed the host bitbake (which
> you said was bitbake 1.8.10). What error happened?
it was temporary breakage since, when i switched to the dev branch,
the invocation of bitbake reverted to the fedora-installed package,
which was 1.8.10, which was rejected as being too old for the dev
branch. it just took a few seconds to realize what had happened.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
"Kernel Newbie Corner" column @ linux.com: http://cli.gs/WG6WYX
========================================================================
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list