[oe] Patch for libfann-2.0.0 recipe

[Philip Balister]

Koen Kooi wrote:
> On 18-06-09 18:52, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello Koen,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Koen Kooi<k.kooi at student.utwente.nl>  
>> wrote:
>>>> PR = "r01"
>>>
>>> Don't set PR to that.
>>
>> I believe that most people prefer to always have PR field included;
>> obviously it ought to be PR = "r1" or PR = "r0" but it is harder to
>> forget to update it when it shows in the recipe.
> 
> That's nonsense. Not setting PR = "r0" in recipes makes maintenance a 
> lot easier, e.g. forcing rebuild or all xorg libs. If every recipe was 
> already using INC_PR, I might agree with you, but since that isn't the 
> case adding PR = "r0" is creating more work.

Can you explain this a little clearer? I know a number of people on the 
list feel like Otavio and it would be really helpful for people to 
understand what the downside is to starting with PR = "r0" instead of 
leaving it out.

Philip
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3303 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20090618/d39592bf/attachment-0002.bin>