[oe] FILESPATHPKG question

[Philip Balister]

Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 09:54 -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
>> +FILESPATHPKG = "u-boot-git:u-boot:files:."
> 
>> Ignore the added patch :) Should I go ahead and push the FILESPATHPKG 
>> change? Otherwise all the patches will end up in the files directory ....
> 
> Wouldn't you be better off just prepending to FILESPATHPKG rather than
> replacing it?  As in, FILESPATHPKG =. "u-boot-git:" or something.

I'd taken from a similar patch for uclibc. (That needs acks or comments).

What's the difference between =+ ad =.? Both work and I see more of the 
=+ form?

Philip

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3303 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20090506/b7deecbb/attachment-0002.bin>