[oe] FILESPATHPKG question

[Philip Balister]

Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org> wrote:
>> Phil Blundell wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 09:54 -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
>>>> +FILESPATHPKG = "u-boot-git:u-boot:files:."
>>>> Ignore the added patch :) Should I go ahead and push the FILESPATHPKG
>>>> change? Otherwise all the patches will end up in the files directory ....
>>> Wouldn't you be better off just prepending to FILESPATHPKG rather than
>>> replacing it?  As in, FILESPATHPKG =. "u-boot-git:" or something.
>> I'd taken from a similar patch for uclibc. (That needs acks or comments).
>>
>> What's the difference between =+ ad =.? Both work and I see more of the =+
>> form?
> 
> The + operations insert a space separator.  The FILESPATH vars use :
> as their separator, not +, so no, they don't "Both work".

Theoretically you might be correct :)

But,

FILESPATHPKG =+ "u-boot-git:"

is working for me. I'll push the =. form in case this changes in the 
future. I want to make sure I understand what is going on so we can get 
the most correct fixes in.

Could someone also look at the uclibc patch for this sort of thing?

http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/436/

Philip
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3303 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20090506/c5114d2c/attachment-0002.bin>