[oe] [PATCH 6/6] angstrom: use GCC 4.3.3 for Geode devices

[Tom Rini]

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:22:52AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:56:58PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> On 13-05-09 16:46, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>>>> From: Marcin Juszkiewicz<hrw at openembedded.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz<hrw at openembedded.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>   conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf |    1 +
>>>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf b/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
>>>> index a466834..b5dbc48 100644
>>>> --- a/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
>>>> +++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
>>>> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_bfin			= "4.1.2"
>>>>
>>>>   ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_486sx      = "4.3.3"
>>>>   ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_armv7a     = "4.3.3"
>>>> +ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_geode      = "4.3.3"
>>>>
>>>>   # Uncomment this if want need to build an armv7a kernel with CSL toolchain (<2.6.27 don't boot with mainline gcc)
>>>>   #KERNEL_CCSUFFIX_armv7a= "-4.2.1+csl-arm-2007q3-53"
>>> NAK, this would interfere with an outstanding patch that Graeme and I 
>>>  are testing:
>>>
>>> http://dominion.thruhere.net/koen/OE/angstrom-dev-toolchain.diff
>>
>> wrt that patch, is there a reason you aren't bumping ppc as well?  As an
>> old PPC guy, that's always had me perplexed..
>
> There are rumours of problems. But I suspect we do not know specifics.  
> Any testing would be great :)

OK, I've got a 405GP eval board dug up, I'll get a 'make check' going
sometime soon and report back.  That should cover the xilinx case too,
fwiw.

-- 
Tom Rini