[oe] [PATCH] gst-plugins: fixed pattern for meta package dependencies.

[Ihar Hrachyshka]

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Phil Blundell <pb at reciva.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 16:47 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> This kind of matching on the package name is a bit unwholesome in
>> general.  It would be better to handle these excluded packages by
>> maintaining them in the blacklist at the point where they're actually
>> created, rather than trying to recreate that information again after the
>> fact.
>
> Or, actually, in this specific case, just maintain a positive list of
> the plugin packages that you _do_ want the metapackage to depend on, and
> make it depend on those packages alone rather than starting from
> ${PACKAGES} and filtering things out.

I think -meta package should depend on *all* the plugins. That's what
-meta is made for. I think it's not very efficient to test every new
gst-plugins-* release if there are any new or obsolete plugins there.

>
> p.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>