[oe] Kernel recipes with broken PRs now

[Leon Woestenberg]

Hello all,

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 10:23 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Now, if people posting in this thread would bother to read the original
>> RFC (that got approved for .dev as well as stable/2009), we wouldn't be
>> having this discussion.
>
> I guess the RFC in question is this one:
>
> http://projects.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2009-April/009578.html
>
> but it doesn't seem to really address the issues that have been raised
> in this thread.  Indeed, looking at the responses that were posted to
> the original RFC it doesn't seem at all obvious that there was a
> consensus in favour of the patch; Otavio Salvador said that he was
> "fully support[ive]" of it, but everybody else who posted seemed to have
> some or other reservations.
>

Can we use [HEADS UP] in the subject line when an intrusive patch has
landed in .dev, apart from the RFC?

I will write a RFC for this one. :-)

Regards,
-- 
Leon