[oe] Mono
Khem Raj
raj.khem at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 22:20:24 UTC 2009
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
>> - file://mono-cross-compilation-for-amd64.patch;patch=1 \
>> +# file://mono-cross-compilation-for-amd64.patch;patch=1 \
>
> That patch (mono-cross-compilation-for-amd64) does look pretty bogus.
> The file header says:
>
> "This is a workaround for bug 515050
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515050#c2
>
> Real fix is something else which did not make into 2.4.2
> http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-June/151386.html
> http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-June/151387.html
>
> but we are ok with workaround its safe."
that was the remarks from the threads which discussed the above bug. I
forgot to include the complete reference.
I was merely going by the comments in the thread.
cbrake had a locally disable this patch and tested but did not yet commit it.
>
> ... but it's hard to see how forcing MONO_ARCH_SUPPORT_SIMD_INTRINSICS
> unconditionally really counts as "safe": this seems almost certain to
> break on any target that doesn't actually have that support. If this
> patch were moved to SRC_URI_append_amd64 then it'd probably be ok, but
> the patches from those other two URLs look like a better solution.
>
> p.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list