[oe] [PATCH] boost: more elaborate and correct usage of GCC atomicity.

[Przemyslaw Wesolek]

Koen Kooi wrote:
> Your patch seems to be based on an old (as in: the day before yesterday)
> snapshot of OE. I added a different set of patches which do almost the
> same, but keep proper atomic ops for armv6 and armv7a, while yours would
> fall back to emulated atomic ops for all arm platforms.

Great. But I see that my change:

>> diff --git a/recipes/boost/files/atomic_count_gcc_atomicity.patch
>> b/recipes/boost/files/atomic_count_gcc_atomicity.patch
>> index 7d08e73..3b09a8a 100644
>> --- a/recipes/boost/files/atomic_count_gcc_atomicity.patch
>> +++ b/recipes/boost/files/atomic_count_gcc_atomicity.patch
>> @@ -2,12 +2,15 @@ Index: boost_1_33_1/boost/detail/atomic_count_gcc.hpp
>>   ===================================================================
>>   --- boost_1_33_1.orig/boost/detail/atomic_count_gcc.hpp   
>> 2008-05-01 20:43:45.000000000 +0200
>>   +++ boost_1_33_1/boost/detail/atomic_count_gcc.hpp    2008-05-01
>> 20:43:55.000000000 +0200
>> -@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>> +@@ -17,7 +17,11 @@
>>    //  http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
>>    //
>>
>> --#include<bits/atomicity.h>
>> ++#if __GNUC__ * 100 + __GNUC_MINOR__>= 402
>>   +#include<ext/atomicity.h>
>> ++#else
>> + #include<bits/atomicity.h>
>> ++#endif
>>
>>    namespace boost
>>    {

is still applicable. Shell I post a patch for this issue separately?

Przemek