[oe] [PATCH] wrong checksum for libsdl-mixer-1.2.9

[Philip Balister]

On 11/21/2009 01:07 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2009/11/21 Bernhard Kaindl<bernhard.kaindl at gmx.net>:
>> Hi,
>>    indeed, the SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz has changed on
>> http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_net/release,
>> so conf/checksums.ini is outdated, as it stands, and has to be updated:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kaindl<bernhard.kaindl at gmx.net>
>>
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/conf/checksums.ini b/conf/checksums.ini
>> index 784a092..e1aac1f 100644
>> --- a/conf/checksums.ini
>> +++ b/conf/checksums.ini
>> @@ -1099,8 +1099,8 @@ md5=0b5b91015d0f3bd9597e094ba67c4d65
>>   sha256=a8222a274778ff16d0e3ee49a30db27a48a4d357169a915fc599a764e405e0b6
>>
>>   [http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/release/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz]
>> -md5=a9eb8750e920829ff41dbe7555850156
>> -sha256=557910a4a3aeed6d10238e26b5a39b19247115a1b352580082bb15dc02ae4b8d
>> +md5=09eb4585f46d3527fe7fce8af8f9e591
>> +sha256=7216a89d92327d2f0fe03e78f3c758a52be68c29daf8e971c226f4a3191e9ec0
>>
>>   [http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_net/release/SDL_net-1.2.5.tar.gz]
>>   md5=e45b1048d2747480dcc65ece4130a920
>>
>> Philip Balister schrieb:
>>>
>>> On 11/21/2009 01:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, GNUtoo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> `/home/embedded/sources/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz' saved [2690766/2690766]
>>>>>
>>>>> NOTE: The MD5Sums did not match. Wanted:
>>>>> 'a9eb8750e920829ff41dbe7555850156' and Got:
>>>>> '09eb4585f46d3527fe7fce8af8f9e591'
>>>>
>>>>    that second checksum is, in fact, the correct one for that tarball.
>>>> and the sha256sum in conf/checksums.ini also doesn't match the one for
>>>> that tarball.  if that used to be correct, does that mean someone has
>>>> replaced a tarball with a different but identically-named one?
>
> Before committing this patch I would suggest comparing the new and the
> old version to find out what is actually causing this and what has
> been changed.
> If we just blindly change checksums we might as well abandon them.
> Also note that a change of the checksum means that everyone who has
> the file in his/her download dir will get a checksum error.

http://www.libsdl.org/news.php

Suggests this is a "bugfix".

Regarding the patch, following the commit policy here:

http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Commit_log_example

Well, the commit message policy, makes it much easier to commit patches 
since we do not need to fix up the commit message.

Philip


>
> For now a nack from me.
>
> As this already happened before recently (perl twig) I suggest we
> adapt a policy for this or maybe some automated removal (e.g. if you
> have a file in your downloads dir with a checksum in blacklist.ini
> that version is not used but removed or parked aside or something like
> that).
>
> Frans
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>