[oe] PING Re: [PATCH] improve printing dependent tasks

Phil Blundell philb at gnu.org
Mon Nov 23 10:23:15 UTC 2009


On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:18 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> PING ?
> 
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:56:38PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> >Print names instead of Task-IDs (and not mentioning they're task ids).
> >
> >Previously we printed e.g.:
> >Dependency loop #1 found:
> >  Task 89 (/there/src/oe/openembedded/recipes/busybox/busybox-native_1.15.2.bb, do_configure) (depends: Set([88, 282, 92, 87]))
> >
> >Now we say
> >Dependency loop #1 found:
> >  Task 89 (/there/src/oe/openembedded/recipes/busybox/busybox-native_1.15.2.bb, do_configure) (dependent Tasks ['busybox-native, do_patch', 'update-rc.d, do_populate_staging', 'busybox-native, do_populate_staging', 'shasum-native.bb, do_populate_staging', 'busybox-native, do_unpack'])

It seems a bit weird to leave "Task 89" printed numerically if you are
going to expand all the others to text.  I'd have thought we would want
them all to be consistent.

That aside, though, this is a bitbake patch and you should probably send
it to the bitbake-dev list rather than openembedded-devel.

p.






More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list