[oe] unable to bitbake ortp
Khem Raj
raj.khem at gmail.com
Sat Sep 5 20:41:16 UTC 2009
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Phil Blundell<philb at gnu.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 10:50 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> If you are using .dev then there is ortp-0.13 which I built here
>> without any problem
>> on a sidenote it says DEPENDS = "glibc " which I think should be
>> changed to virtual/libc
>> but as long as you are using glibc/eglibc based system it should not
>> be a problem.
>
> Specifying virtual/libc in a recipe's DEPENDS would usually be a bit
> silly since base.bbclass adds it automatically. Specifying glibc there
> would perhaps be legitimate for packages that actually require features
> of glibc itself, but I doubt that is the case here.
>
> I suspect that the line in question is probably a slightly mangled
> attempt to depend on either glib-1.2 or glib-2.0, which would be
> consistent with the original poster's complaint that glib.h was missing.
>
Seems right. Looking at ortp 0.13 sources glib dependency is removed
but if you look at changelog
Wednesday March 8 2006 : ortp-0.9.0
- a lot of cleanups, glib dropped, win32 port reactivated
so it seems prior to 0.9 one needs to depend on glib.
And I was building 0.13 and I was not getting this error.
So I think right fix is to add glib dependency in 0.7 recipe.
and remove it from 0.13
> p.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list