[oe] [oe-commits] Joshua Lock : packaged-staging: post-process non-binary files to fix paths packages

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 17:34 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:05 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 12:51 +0000, git version control wrote:
> > > Module: openembedded.git
> > > Branch: rpurdie/work-in-progress
> > > Commit: 5df536641049c5af6413e410aa20bb97880fe897
> > > URL:    http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=openembedded.git&a=commit;h=5df536641049c5af6413e410aa20bb97880fe897
> > > 
> > > Author: Joshua Lock <josh at linux.intel.com>
> > > Date:   Wed Mar 31 11:22:02 2010 +0100
> > > 
> > > packaged-staging: post-process non-binary files to fix paths packages
> > > 
> > > Add tooling from Poky to scan packages and fix up paths in libtool files, we
> > > then build on this to further post-process native packages (native, cross, sdk)
> > > and fix up any references to the STAGING_DIR in non-binary files.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > There's a lot more than just .la files that get these paths wrong.  If
> > you use the scan_cmd you set on native/etc for everything you can fix
> > them all up.
> 
> It scans everything for -native packages and just .la files for target
> packages. I'd argue that for target packages we're better off fixing the
> problems at source since the real target packages are probably also
> bust?

Ah, hmm.  It's possibly just the .la files on the target (which some of
us would like to see die and I can't argue against), I hadn't really
bothered to differentiate (and I don't think it's a noticeable time
diff).  Less logic also brings it closer to working for relocation of
everything.

-- 
Tom Rini <tom_rini at mentor.com>
Mentor Graphics Corporation