[oe] Request for branch merge

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 23:08 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 01-04-10 22:34, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 13:03 -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi at student.utwente.nl>wrote:
> >>
> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>> On 01-04-10 17:33, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I could post the patches individually and get Acked lines for each one
> >>>> but I'm hoping to avoid that and get permission to merge the branch
> >>>> directly. We have talked about most of these things in one form or
> >>>> another.
> >>>
> >>> I don't think this will get serious review people other than Tom, Khem
> >>> and Chris, so if they don't have huge objections, merge it and we'll
> >>> deal with the fallout together if needed.
> >>
> >>
> >> I agree with Koen on this, it's a definite improvement. Let's get it merged
> >> and deal with any fallout from there.
> > 
> > Generally yes, and just a few things to hash out over the weekend I
> > think.
> 
> I'm going to steal Chris' thunder a bit, but during the TSC meeting we
> agreed that "after the weekend" would be a better time to merge it than
> "now". Dealing with the fallout required lots of attention, which boils
> down to "office hours" for most of the involved.

Sounds good.  And I meant discuss and modify hashing out (with maybe
some step back and rethink for me) :)

-- 
Tom Rini <tom_rini at mentor.com>
Mentor Graphics Corporation