[oe] [PATCH] glib-2.0: remove old glib-2.0-native recipes
Tom Rini
tom_rini at mentor.com
Thu Apr 8 22:50:37 UTC 2010
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 16:33 -0500, Mike Westerhof wrote:
> Antonio Ospite wrote:
> > Having these around can cause some conflict in recipes depending on
> > recent glib-2.0-native, see [1].
> >
> > What can happen is that, when no preferred versions are set (like in
> > DISTRO=minimal), bitbake picks up an older -native recipe even if a more
> > recent one using the BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" mechanism exists.
> >
> > [1] http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/packages/540390/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite at studenti.unina.it>
> > ---
> > Please check if the commit message is clear enough, I think I've figured
> > out what's happening behind the scenes, but I have not that deep
> > knowledge of bitbake.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Antonio Ospite
> > http://ao2.it
> >
> >
> > .../glib-gettextize-dir.patch | 11 --
> > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.12.4.bb | 49 ----------
> > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.16.1.bb | 40 --------
> > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.18.0.bb | 40 --------
> > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.2.3.bb | 100 --------------------
> > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.22.1.bb | 39 --------
> > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.4.6.bb | 49 ----------
> > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.6.5.bb | 51 ----------
> > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.6.6.bb | 51 ----------
> > 9 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 430 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native-2.12.4/glib-gettextize-dir.patch
> > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.12.4.bb
> > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.16.1.bb
> > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.18.0.bb
> > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.2.3.bb
> > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.22.1.bb
>
> NACK. This glib version is still in use; don't delete it:
> /u/slug/slugos/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/glib-2.0-native-2.22.1-r6.2
>
> (Surely there must a better way to fix this than removal of active recipes?)
If 2.22.1 was converted to BBCLASSEXTEND, the rest of the mechanisms
would work right again.
--
Tom Rini <tom_rini at mentor.com>
Mentor Graphics Corporation
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list