[oe] [PATCH 4/5] linux_2.6.32: add tb5200l support

[Vitus Jensen]

On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Marco Cavallini wrote:

> Vitus Jensen ha scritto, Il 16/04/2010 18:54:
>> [PATCH 4/5] linux_2.6.32: add tb5200l support
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitus Jensen <vjensen at gmx.de>
>> ---
>>  recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb   |    1 +
>>  recipes/linux/tb5200l/defconfig | 1436 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 1437 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 recipes/linux/tb5200l/defconfig
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb b/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb
>> index 7f2ef0a..85710ac 100644
>> --- a/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb
>> +++ b/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/linux-${PV}"
>>  # Mark archs/machines that this kernel supports
>>  DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
>>  DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_simone = "1"
>> +DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_tb5200l = "1"
>>
>>  SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-${PV}.tar.bz2;name=kernel \
>>             file://defconfig"
>
>
> The /linux/linux_2.6.32.bb part of this patch doesn't apply and it is
> composed by two files, next time submit each file in a single patch,
> moreover you forgot to bump PR.
>
> Please correct and resubmit.

OK, will split the patch.

Sorry, had base the patch on old revision and will rebase it.  But do you 
really think it's neccessary to bump PR?  The patch won't change the 
contents of a recreated package, nothing needs to be rebuild, an 
installed package doesn't have to be updated.  So I think it's fine to 
keep PR when adding DEFAULT_PREFERENCE.

Vitus

-- 
Vitus Jensen, Hannover, Germany, Universe (current)
pgp public key available from keyservers