[oe] [RFC] scsi headers, in glibc-dev or linux-libc-headers-dev?

[Tom Rini]

On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 11:21 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 12:14 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Currently conflicting headers are both in glibc-dev and
> > linux-libc-headers-dev, which isn't a good thing. According to the
> > interwebs we should use the linux-libc-headers version.
> > 
> > Anyone opposed to removing the scsi headers from glibc? It would
> > basically involve reverting
> > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=b8bb2a62b3916470c752bd79d31322b4358fc676
> > and
> > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=83f41716ab6a2a9d83d4ff044dcef00595ecfeb2
> 
> So, I did both of those after checking the interwebs and poking some
> kernel folks (see comments in
> http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4262 ).  The question is,
> did the kernel folks change their mind again and we need to either drop
> older linux-libc-headers (which I'll just assume is a no-go) or go back
> to removing them in new enough linux-libc-headers.

s/in new enough/with new enough/


-- 
Tom Rini <tom_rini at mentor.com>
Mentor Graphics Corporation