[oe] update canutils to current version

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/8/13 Vitus Jensen <vjensen at gmx.de>:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Vitus Jensen <vjensen at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2010/8/13 Vitus Jensen <vjensen at gmx.de>:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Vitus Jensen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The following patches will update canutils to the current version
>>>>>> 4.0.6 and remove older 4.0.x versions.  Also only the latest
>>>>>> version of libsocketcan will be kept.
>>>>>
>>>>> Frans, thank you for the ACKs.  Could you please apply the patches,
>>>>> too? I have no right to do so.
>>>>
>>>> Applied. Thanks for the contribution
>>>>
>>>> System guru's: Vitus's patches did not show up in patchwork
>>>
>>> They did.  But after you posted you ACKs I changed their state to
>>> "Accepted"
>>> and then they are usually filtered by "Action Required".  I'm not really
>>> sure I did the right thing but I don't believe they shouldn't remain in
>>> "New".
>>
>> If they got applied change the state to 'applied'
>
> Sure, already did!  Do I set the 'archive' bit, too?
>
>
> Frans got hit by the fact, that 'accepted' patches don't show up in the list
> by default.
>
> Vitus posts patches
> Frans acks patches
> Vitus changes state to 'accepted'
> Vitus asks Frans to apply
> Frans: where are those patches in patchwork???
> Frans forces his googlemail to produce usable mail and applies
> Vitus changes state to 'applied'
>
> Probably I should update the wiki to document the above procedure, right?
>

I saw a different thread from Paul on patchwork.
Let's discuss this  in that thread.


Frans