[oe] [PATCH] openssl: update 1.0.0 to 1.0.0a

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Mon Aug 16 19:35:59 UTC 2010


On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Roman I Khimov <roman at khimov.ru> wrote:
> В сообщении от Понедельник 16 августа 2010 22:59:53 автор Frans Meulenbroeks
> написал:
>> One small question: Do we want to keep this recipe at
>> DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" ??
>
> Well, we're using 1.0.0 since the day it's been released, and it's a perfect
> fit for us, but I know that it _might_ break some things, just google for
> openssl 1.0.0 breakage/compatibility patches/etc, that's why I've pushed it
> that way so that distro maintainers could test whether it works for them with
> their particular package sets and act accordingly.
>
> I certainly have nothing against removing that line if everyone is OK with
> that.
>

IMO the newest version in a recipe should always be default preference
this way we can
stabilize recipe upgrades quicker. This also means a wider testing
before pushing a new recipe
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" makes it to escape the testing.

> --
>  http://roman.khimov.ru
> mailto: roman at khimov.ru
> gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
>




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list