[oe] [PATCH 2/2] recipes: Update recipes to get 'bitbake world' parse and calculate runqueue successfully.

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

Koen brought up this in the thread on the review process. As it
(mostly) is about this thread I felt it was more appropriate here.


>> = me
> = Koen

>> I see two things happening.
>> - patches are submitted for review but do not gain any feedback in a
>> reasonable time. I have several patches in the queue that did not get
>> any feedback.
>> - people are abusing their powers by rejecting changes without
>> motivation. See e.g [1] and [2]. I feel if you reject a patch you have
>> an obligation to explain why you rejected it.
>
> If you want to delete a recipe I maintain, the burden is on you or are
> you saying that maintainers aren't in charge of their recipes anymore?


>>[1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-August/023374.html
>>[2] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-August/023270.html

The 10 recipes Koen nack-ed:
>  recipes/angstrom/angstrom-bootmanager.bb           |    2 +-
>  recipes/esc/esc-node-demo_git.bb                   |    4 +-
>  recipes/meta/meta-toolchain-arago-dvsdk.bb         |    1 +
>  recipes/sugar/sugar-fructose.bb                    |    2 +-
>  recipes/tasks/task-arago-toolchain-target.bb       |    3 +-
>  recipes/tasks/task-demo-x11.bb                     |   17 ++---
>  recipes/tasks/task-gmae.bb                         |    7 ++
>  recipes/tasks/task-gpe.bb                          |    6 +-
>  recipes/udev/udev-compat141_141.bb                 |    6 ++-
>  recipes/vlc/vlc-davinci_0.8.6h.bb                  |    2 +-

Person:     Koen Kooi
Mail:       koen at openembedded.org
Website:    http://dominion.kabel.utwente.nl/koen/cms
Machines:   h2200, ipaq-pxa270, efika, ep93xx, netbook-pro
Distros:    �~Engstr��m
Interests:  OpenSync, GNOME, GPE, Matchbox
Recipes:    abiword, bootchart, dia, farsight, freeciv, fuse, galago,
geda, gimp,
Recipes:    gnumeric, gobby, obby, imposter, inkscape
Recipes:    *moko*, telepathy, tilibs, xchat, xournal.

I don't know what others think about it, but I see only a few matches.

That of course does not mean that Koen is not entitiled to an opinion.
Of course not, this is a rerview request and everyone may react to it.
However, I, and I think most of us would appreciate it if this is done
in a professional, polite and friendly manner.

(btw wrt the other two post about the 3 conf/distro/include files I
proposed to delete: two are gpe, and one is maemo. you may consider
yourself to be the maintainer of the gpe recipes. I've clearly
indicated why I wanted to remove them and you did not address any of
my concerns and observations; also as I wrote before maintainership
also comes with obligations. These files are clearly broken so it
seems the maintainer has some work there.)

Frans

PS: I think this is also an excellent case why it is a good idea to
identify the maintainer within the recipe/